Re: [FE-discuss] Chained validators again

Top Page
Author: Ian Bicking
Date:  
To: Andrea Riciputi
CC: formencode-discuss
Subject: Re: [FE-discuss] Chained validators again
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Andrea Riciputi <mr.rech.list@???> wrote:
> Thanks Ian,
> I was able to make it work as inteded. However I was wondering if it was
> better to make those kind of chained validators to inherit from
> FormValidator instead that from FancyValidator. Which is the real purpose of
> FormValidators? The documentation is quite terse.


Yeah, FormValidator would be better. FormValidators just validate
dictionaries instead of single values, but there are also a couple of
other small differences (like the definition of "empty").


-- 
Ian Bicking  |  http://blog.ianbicking.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
FormEncode-discuss mailing list
FormEncode-discuss@???
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/formencode-discuss