On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Graham
Dumpleton<graham.dumpleton@???> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 7:04 am, Ian Bicking <ianbick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote:
>>
>> > What's the status of webob on Python 3? Is there a way to use webob
>> > with Python 3? Plans?
>>
>> > The same questions applies to webtest.
>>
>> I was hoping for WSGI 2, which clarifies a bunch of Python 3 issues, to
>> happen before porting WebOb etc.
>
> Some people want more significant changes to WSGI 2.0 beyond just
> clarifications. Such as getting rid of start_response(). Is that also
> what you are waiting for?
No, only the unicode clarifications. start_response isn't a bit deal
one way or the other.
> FWIW, WSGI 2.0 looks like a dead duck to me and even an updated WSGI
> 1.0 for Python 3.0 doesn't look like it is going anywhere now.
Well, there's no blockers, there's just no momentum.
> Part of the problem with going forward is the minority who somehow
> want WSGI to support asynchronous systems. To my mind trying to do
> that would be a mistake and the previous discussions about it have
> only served to slow things down even more.
I agree.
> The other problem is that there is no defined process for updating
> WSGI specification. The idea that consensus will work has failed.
I'm not convinced of that -- I think we were simply distracted, not derailed.
--
Ian Bicking | http://blog.ianbicking.org | http://topplabs.org/civichacker
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Paste Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to paste-users@???
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to paste-users+unsubscribe@???
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/paste-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
